SBS60 · GRCh37 · COSMIC v96

Mutational profile

Genome: GRCh37

Genome: GRCh38

Genome: mm9

Genome: mm10

Genome: rn6

Mutational profile using the conventional 96 mutation type classification. This classification is based on the six substitution subtypes: C>A, C>G, C>T, T>A, T>C, and T>G, as well as the nucleotides immediately 5’ and 3’ to the mutation.

Each of the substitutions is referred to by the pyrimidine of the mutated Watson—Crick base pair. Incorporating information on the bases immediately 5’ and 3’ to each mutated base generates 96 possible mutation types (6 types of substitution x 4 types of 5’ base x 4 types of 3’ base). Mutational signatures are displayed and reported based on the observed trinucleotide frequency of the genome, i.e., representing the relative proportions of mutations generated by each signature based on the actual trinucleotide frequencies of the corresponding reference genome.

Proposed aetiology

Possible sequencing artefact.

Acceptance criteria

Supporting evidence for mutational signature validity

Validated evidence for real signature
Unclear evidence for real signature
Evidence for artefact signature
Background Identification study First included in COSMIC
Alexandrov et al. 2020 Nature v3
Identification NGS technique Different variant callers Multiple sequencing centres
WES & WGS Yes Yes
Technical validation Validated in orthogonal techniques Replicated in additional studies Extended context enrichment
Yes Yes -
Proposed aetiology Mutational process Support
Sequencing artifact Experimental validation
Experimental validation Experimental study Species
- -

Summary of the technical and experimental evidence available in the scientific literature regarding the validation of the mutational signature.

Tissue distribution

v3.2_SBS60_TISSUE.jpg

Numbers of mutations per megabase attributed to the mutational signature across the cancer types in which the signature was found. Each dot represents an individual sample and only samples where the signature is found are shown. The number of mutations per megabase was calculated by assuming that an average whole-exome has 30 Mb with sufficient coverage, whereas an average whole-genome has 2,800 Mb with sufficient coverage.

The numbers below the dots for each cancer type indicate the number of high confidence tumours in which at least 10 mutations were attributed to the signature (above the blue horizontal line) and the total number of high confidence tumours analysed (below the blue horizontal line). Only high confidence data are displayed: samples with reconstruction accuracy >0.90. The number of mutations per megabase was calculated by assuming that an average exome has 30 Mb with sufficient coverage, whereas an average whole genome has 2,800 Mb with sufficient coverage.

Replication timing

Topography analysis could not be performed for replication timing as the number of mutations satisfying our constraints was insufficient or this signature was not yet analysed.

Nucleosome occupancy

Topography analysis could not be performed for nucleosome occupancy as the number of mutations satisfying our constraints was insufficient or this signature was not yet analysed.

CTCF occupancy

Topography analysis could not be performed for CTCF occupancy as the number of mutations satisfying our constraints was insufficient or this signature was not yet analysed.

Histone modifications

Topography analysis could not be performed for histone modifications as the number of mutations satisfying our constraints was insufficient or this signature was not yet analysed.

Transcriptional strand asymmetry

Topography analysis could not be performed for transcriptional strand asymmetry as the number of mutations satisfying our constraints was insufficient or this signature was not yet analysed.

Genic and intergenic regions

Topography analysis could not be performed for genic and intergenic region asymmetry as the number of mutations satisfying our constraints was insufficient or this signature was not yet analysed.

Replicational strand asymmetry

Topography analysis could not be performed for replicational strand asymmetry as the number of mutations satisfying our constraints was insufficient or this signature was not yet analysed.

Strand-coordinated mutagenesis

Topography analysis could not be performed for strand-coordinated mutagenesis as the number of satisfying our constraints was insufficient or this signature was not yet analysed.